A Sample Size of One

BCAlthough he has never addressed the subject directly I suspect my self labeled “Genuine white Supremacist” neighbor is a sample size of one. He calls himself a white Supremacist but denies any connection with or allegiance to any of the typical white supremacist movements including Nazism, the Ku Klux Klan or Christian Identity. I have asked him if he belongs to a group or church and where he learned his philosophy from but he never seems to want to answer that question. At this point if I had to guess as to where his philosophy came from I would say he simply made it all up on his own. In this respect I cannot say with any certainty that his white Supremacy is indicative of white Supremacy at large.

He claims to be a Christian. Normally I would not question the veracity of a person’s claim to be Christian. However, he also claims that true Christianity requires a person be a racist and anyone who is not a racist cannot authentically call themselves a Christian. Certainly, I support the right of anyone to make outrageous claims on their own blogs or platforms. But he insists (for some reason) on posting his radical philosophy in the comment section of my blog posts. As such I believe it is entirely in my right to respond to him in this way.

He claims his racism is a “traditional” racism which is not to be confused with the “liberal” definition of racism. According to him, “traditional racism” actually means “love of Father” and not (as he says the liberal conception of racism espouses) hatred of the black man. This love of Father in his mind is connected with the “white race” and his line of white fathers which he claims stretches back in an unbroken white line all the way to God the Father Himself. He specifically rejects the scientific consensus that all presently alive humans (black and white alike) can trace their ancestry back to a common line of fathers. Presumably he sees this research as a liberal conspiracy or some such. Despite his claims that his racism is a love of father and not hatred of “other” he has specifically stated he is against racial mixing and integration. In this respect, I am not sure how his love of father differs from hatred of the other. It seems as if he does not want to fully own his racism.

His logic in claiming Christianity endorses racism seems to be rooted in the primacy of racism in his own mind. In other words, he believes racism is true and correct and that Christianity is also true and correct. As such Christianity ipso facto must endorse racism and anyone who does not endorse racism is ipso facto not a real Christian.

The rather glaring problem with this logic is not only that there is no scriptural basis to support this argument, there is substantial scriptural basis to reject this argument.

Love Thy Neighbor / Good Samaritan

In the Gospel of Luke, Jesus teaches that love of God and love of neighbor are of primary importance under the law. By saying that love of neighbor is second only to loving God with all one’s heart Jesus is ranking love of neighbor above the commandment to honor one’s biological parents. When asked “who is my neighbor?” Jesus responded with the parable of the Good Samaritan.

… A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead. And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side. But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him, And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him… Which now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves? And he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise. (Lk 10:30-37).

Here we see Jesus explain that one’s neighbor is defined by his behavior (specifically acts of kindness and compassion) and not by race or political affiliation. This point is made even clearer when one considers the fact that Jews and Samaritans were of separate lineages and enemies in the context of this story. Certainly, if Christianity preached a gospel that racism is of primary importance that fact would have been referenced in this parable.

Hate Thy Father

Indeed, in the Gospel of Luke Jesus specifically states that one must reject his biological ties in order to follow him.

If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. (Lk 14:26)

It is the consensus of biblical scholars that this rather strongly worded passage is properly interpreted to mean that a follower of Jesus needs to prioritize Him above one’s kin. At the very least this passage calls into question the notion that love of one’s line of fathers is of primary importance for a true Christian.

Teach All Nations

In the Gospel of Matthew, the risen Jesus instructs his disciples to “… teach all nations…” (Mt 28:19). There is no instruction to restrict Christianity to white people or to any specific people as there would have to be if Christianity espoused a doctrine of racism.

Things Above

 In Paul’s letter to the Colossians he says to “[s]et your affection on things above, not on things on the earth.” (Col 3:2). Clearly one’s race is tied to materiality and of lesser importance that one’s life with Christ. In light of these and many other passages I could reference there is simply no scriptural basis to support the idea that Christ taught a gospel of racism. When I consider this in light of the fact that I have never heard anyone argue that Christ taught racism and the fact that my self labeled “Genuine white Supremacist” neighbor does not claim to belong to any particular community of fellow believers, I must conclude that he is very much alone in the world. Although his beliefs are interesting in their bizarre complexity and consistency I do not think they reflect anything greater than the contents of his own mind.


Filed under Uncategorized

101 responses to “A Sample Size of One

  1. thordaddy


    You’ve never studied ANY “white supremacy” movements any more than you have studied a single “white supremacist.” If you had and believe me when I say that you are hardly alone as even the these KKK, neo-Nazis and CI adherents have never even recognized the first red flag signaling mass brainwashing then you would know that all these groups ARE LABELED by the zeitgeist AND DO NOT ACTUALLY self-identify as wS. And the reason is very simple… These groups are anti-Supremacy… Anti-Perfection… Anti-Perfect Man… Anti-Perfect white man… ANTI-white Supremacy…

    SO IN REALITY, these groups are your “allies” and the enemy of the genuine white Supremacist.

    It still does not dawn on you that THE PERFECT MAN AS EMPIRICAL FACT FALSIFIES “universal equality” FOR ALL OF ETERNITY and clearly it would be beyond absurd to claim that Christ taught against this reality.


    1. The Perfect Man as empirical fact.
    2. No such “thing” as “universal equality.
    3. Ergo, white man strives towards Supremacy.
    4. We call such white man a “white Supremacist.
    5. Blacks HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH 1-4 beyond simply agreeing or showing an enemy face.

    • If a “black” strove for supremacy would he still be an enemy according to this personal philosophy of yours? If so, why?

      • thordaddy


        A genuine black Supremacist, operating in a parallel path to the white Supremacist and only differentiating in his origin, would not be my enemy. But this is rather here nor there. There are no KNOWN genuine black Supremacists or any high profile black Christians calling for black Supremacy. And of course, inherent to the relationship amongst white Supremacy and black Supremacy are FRICTIONLESS, ie., separate, BUT parallel paths.

      • I don’t then understand why race is so important to you that you must change Christian dogma to accommodate it. Why not just be a Supremacist?

      • thordaddy


        When you ask, “I don’t then understand why race is so important…”

        What you are really SAYING is why can’t I just make “race” meaningless so that Christianity can be subsumed by liberal ideology and “universal equality” can be realized?

        I don’t MAKE “race” important… I simply accept its factual basis. I recognize that a white Supremacist is something MORE PARTICULARLY REAL than just a Supremacist… A white Christian is something more particularly real than just a Christian… So in no way could one make the argument that the white Supremacist is less than the Supremacist or that the white Christian is less than the Christian.

      • You have never established any link between whiteness and Christianity. The connection certainly has no scriptural basis. It seems to exist in your mind because you want it to. Ironically you accuse everyone else to be radically autonomous.

      • thordaddy


        I don’t need to provide any connection… Reality connects the white race and Christianity. You seem to believe that you are called to unmake this realistic connection?

      • If reality connects whiteness and Christianity then you should have no problem articulating this connection.

      • thordaddy


        Are you literally claiming that white Christians ARE JUST Christians and therefore white Christians do not exist?

        This is WHY is call myself a white Supremacist.

      • Of course white Christian exist. That does not mean that whiteness is fundamental to Christianity in any way.

      • thordaddy


        Who said that white race was “fundamental” to Christianity? The white race either embraces the Christian Assertion or rejects its. And the white race continues to exist or goes out of existence. You seem to be under the belief that the latter question is meaningless even though it is in the rejection of the Christian Assertion that the white race goes out of existence… But some Christians believe in self-annihilation and some do not. Ergo, they SHOULD NOT both be called the SAME thing.

      • The white race is not a monolithic entity and physical existence is not the goal of Christianity.

      • thordaddy


        So… And no one made that claim.

      • thordaddy


        Does “luck” even exist in the paradigm you claim to believe in?

        If you’ve never starved yourself, how can you ever be “hungry?”

        If you’ve never provoked evil, how do you know you are even alive?

        If you don’t create reaction in other sentient beings, how are you to be acknowledged?

        Being weak in order to maintain physical proximity to one’s children in a “society” where being extremely forceful to keep them close is culturally verboten (plus potentially “criminal”) leaves the REAL FATHER where exactly?

        You cannot fear a conversion to wS based on what you might lose because you might lose everything. But it is this very potential reality that should inspire you to convert. Because it is that very potential reality that TELLS YOU how weak and submissive a path you presently walk.

      • Loving neighbor as Christ teaches is not a weak and submissive path. What is weak and submissive is to hide alone in one’s house afraid of the other.

      • thordaddy

        Lol… I spend about 50 hrs a week bouncing in a couple beach bars in San Diego… Come on, man.

      • thordaddy


        My “work” IS “spending time with the neighbors.” Twenty years of spending that time. Imagine the insight one could glean from twenty years with the neighbors? You are the insulated one , my friend. I roam like wS and people just know it.

      • thordaddy


        Point is… I put my love to the test and you make sure not to be amongst the “neighbors” you speak so fondly of…

      • How do you know what I do?

      • thordaddy


        By what you believe, of course.

      • That scripture is the source of Christ’s teachings and not something I invented to lend legitimacy to my personal prejudices?

      • thordaddy


        It is “love thy neighbor AS THY LOVE THYSELF

        This command is contingent… Relational… With its emphasis on “as thy love thyself.” So the degree to which one loves his self is the degree to which one shall love his neighbors… This is the command and what it tells “us” is that if one hates himself then he’ll choose neighbors that he equally hates and vice versa. And this is, in fact, our LIBERAL REALITY… A mass of self-loathing individuals desirous of neighbors worthy of hatred. Of course, one should possess a healthy self-regard to the point of desiring likably worthy neighbors.

        Your interpretation is naive and rather absurd. It tells the Christian he not only must love a hateful, evil “neighbor,” but he must just accept such a degenerate as his “neighbor.” It’s ridiculous.

      • Wrong. We’ve been through this before. Jesus specifically defined what he means by neighbor in the parable of the Good Samaritan. It is not defined by race but by compassion.

      • thordaddy


        And those that SHOW COMPASSION are the arbiter of what a “neighbor” is… Not those shown compassion… Those shown compassion are “neighbors” by the spiritual edict of the Good Samaritan.

      • Agreed. Regardless of race.

      • thordaddy


        The point is that your ideology ONLY determines YOUR neighbor and no one else’s REGARDLESS of any racial consideration.

      • My “ideology” is what Christ teaches in the gospels.

      • thordaddy


        Christianity doesn’t mandate you force other people to live amongst those who would destroy their neighborhoods by mob force.

      • thordaddy


        Of course, no one SAYS THIS… If they did then they would be hanged from a lamp post… INSTEAD… They ENFORCE it legally, socially, culturally and politically USING a mass of morons whose ability to discern right from wrong, good from evil, straight from crooked and NEIGHBOR from PREDATOR just does not exist

        And here you come along UNDER the guise of “Christianity” to ONLY EMBOLDEN this devolution.

        YOUR COMPASSION for the “other” MAKES YOU the GOOD “neighbor.” It DOES NOT MAKE the “other” MY GOOD NEIGHBOR.

      • Who would hang them from a lamp post? I thought the liberals were the ones who employed mob violence in your concept of reality.

      • thordaddy


        I never made any such claim… My only claim was that those who clamor for “universal equality” do so with the understanding that it shall be enforced by the mob. It is not at though a single individual could actually make us all equal. For this, ONE needs a MOB.

        But I digress and prevent you from going off on a tangent. The point was clear… Openly vocal MADMEN get what is coming… Usually rather swiftly no matter how advanced or primitive a society may be… So SMART madmen ARE MUCH MORE SUBTLE.

        YOUR compassion MAKES YOU the good neighbor to the other AND DOES NOT then make the other a good neighbor to me NOR does it force me to show this other compassion equal to yours. And nothing in Scripture mandates this interpretation. The call of Christ is to show compassion to those IN NEED regardless… It is not a call to invite evil next door.

      • What do you mean when you say “universal equality”?

      • thordaddy


        “Universal equality” = equality applied to all the universe…

      • thordaddy


        Uhhhh… Liberals who DEMAND “equality” and REJECT Supremacy.

      • Please provide an example of one person who fits this example.

      • When have I rejected supremacy and demanded equality? Please be specific.

      • thordaddy


        In your interpretation of “love thy neighbor” is your demand for “equality” and in your lowering the case of “supremacy” is evidence of your rejection of Supremacy.

      • You cannot love someone who is not equal to you? I assume you love your children?

      • thordaddy


        Of course YOU CAN… What that has to do with FORCING others to do the same by threat of violence, I’m not sure?

      • When have I ever forced anyone to love their neighbor through a threat of violence?

      • thordaddy


        You as an individual? Probably never. You as a conscious aspect of the collective liberal will, AS WE WRITE. Unless you are here to renounce forced integration?

      • That’s a pretty weak argument as I am sure you are aware.

  2. Where in scripture does Jesus talk about racial survival?

  3. thordaddy


    You say…

    “I am not sure how his love of father differs from hatred of the other.”

    Well then, in cases of acknowledged ignorance, why not ask?

    Why not ask if your children can love you without hating a black stranger? And if you really believe that they are unable to do this then how about you speculate on what kind of society will emerge from this absurdity? I envision a society where the children hate their fathers and “love” black strangers. Some would call this ttotal madness. Some would call it radical autonomy… And then some actually call it “Christianity.” I’m trying to figure out the extent to which those latter two are accountable and how to hold them to account? The nonviolent solution is separation. But this solution is absolutely taboo, So what do you think should happen to the crazies that teach their children to hate their fathers and “love” black strangers?

  4. thordaddy


    I stated very early on that I identify as a white Supremacist so as to separate myself from the self-annihilating modern “Christian” who very much believes in sacrificing his life for the strange “black” collective .

    Both the white Supremacist and the deracinated “Christian” attest to the truth of The Perfect Man as empirical reality. The key difference being that the wS ASSERTS that such fact of reality falsifies “universal equality” absolutely and the latter believe this fact of reality to be their mandate to FORCEFULLY IMPOSE “universal equality.” So this latter group is indistinguishable from Liberal ideology (which DENIES the empirical reality of The Perfect Man)… And, in fact, both the radical autonomist and the liberal “Christian” are allied against wS because he will not sacrifice his life or the life of his children on the altar of radical “black” stranger.

  5. thordaddy

    “A sample size of one.”

    Psychologically, you are indicating your desire for the safety of the herd. In practical effect, this means you are amongst the mass of spectators who are comforted in one’s relative anonymity in a large, obnoxious crowd. On the other hand, spectators expect performance from me. But unlike the Hollywood set, I am neither purchasable nor ignorant monkey doing tricks for treats.

    I already told you early on that the super-majority are anti-white Supremacy and so all the “divisions” are hoaxes utilized for the very purpose of obscuring this fact.

    In other words, to attempt to be a genuine white Supremacist is to be a sample size of one…

    You’re coming along… Slowly, but certainly.

    • So you admit that you made this radically autonomous racial philosophy up in your own head and that you do not belong to a community of believers?

      • thordaddy


        This line of questioning is weird for the ambiguous point is attempts to make?

        So no, I didn’t make this up “in my head.” I simply looked about to see what I see… But this reality is also an extension to Mark Richardson’s work on “autonomy theory.” And “no,” I do not belong to any groups or communities in the sense that you are asking. What relevance this makes, who knows?

      • So if no other Christian believes or has ever believed what you believe regarding race how can you claim your beliefs regarding race are Christian?

      • thordaddy

        The only claim I made was that a white Supremacist equals a white Christian.
        And the way that you ATTEMPT to refute this equality (isn’t that just ironic?) is by equating Supremacist to a “hater of black man” FROM “a believer in Perfection IN AN ODE to Liberal ideology.
        This tactic works for the mass of stupid sheep, but does not work with me.
        The white Supremacist believes in Perfection just as does the white Christian.
        And so the machinations of the zeitgeist are to have one reject being a white Supremacist while simultaneously being ignorant of the fact that they are being brainwashed into a rejection of the white Christian.
        And here we are… This exact scenario playing out where you reject being a white Supremacist without realizing that you are rejecting the idea of being a white Christian and in effect committed to a “liberating” self-annihilation.

      • Do you hate black people?

      • thordaddy


        I hate evil… I hate niggers… And I am naturally suspicious of the “black” collective.

        Of course, in a radically autonomous society, the wS is mired in a oscillating mob of radical autonomists who FLAT OUT DENY the existence of either “evil” or “niggers” and straight up attempt to criminally pathologize what is clearly a HEALTHY SUSPICION GIVEN both known reality and factual history.

        The crazy part is that you ULTIMATELY SIDE with these latter “madmen.”

      • So even though you “hate niggers” your brand of white Supremacy does not equal “hatred of niggers”?

      • thordaddy


        There is no brand. One either rejects degeneracy and self-annihilation absolutely or he does not and is thus inevitably subsumed by it.

        In the context of the white male circa MRKA 2016, he either converts to wS and rejects ALL degeneracy and self-annihilation (the nigger is an archetype perpetuating self-annihilator) or he is assimilated into the zeitgeist of radical autonomy and becomes a traitor to his own wife and children… He becomes the anti-father.

      • So you agree that your racism although couched in the language of love of father is really the same thing as hatred of the black man.

      • thordaddy


        There is no couching… I REJECT YOUR LIBERAL IDEOLOGY hiding itself within Christianity… I reject the idea that Christianity mandates one defy reality and hate his father and “love” the self-annihilator. And I reject the notion that “racism” is inherently and undeniably tied to “blacks” in any way, shape or form. To hate niggers and be suspicious of the “black” collective is not racism, but a healthy-mindedness… A PARTICULARLY ARTICULATE REJECTION of degenerate self-annihilation.

      • It is neither liberal nor conservative to say that Christianity does not endorse your unique brand of racism. The scriptures expressly reject it as I demonstrated in my post. You perfectly free to reject this and live your solitary existence if you so desire.

      • thordaddy


        It is VERY MUCH Liberal ideology to be a vulgar racist… An anti-racist… One who hates his race and “loves” the other. To then ascribe this degenerately self-annihilating ethos to Christianity IS THE WORK of the radical autonomist. And there is absolutely nothing in Scripture mandating either a hatred of one’s race or a love of the “black” collective. NOTHING.

        But even more absurd is pushing this liberal ideology to the point of believing one must now resign to solitary confinement when he, in fact, desires objective Supremacy.

        Are you really unable to “see” the absurdity of your beliefs?

        I must hate my race/father…

        I must “love” evil niggers…

        I must sacrifice my life and the life of my children on the altar of the radical “black” collective…

        And my refusal demands a solitary confinement.

        No… You’re not totalitarian.

        And you call this Christianity?

        And you claim it’s not Liberal ideology?

        And you still see no need for separation?

        And you still see no need for me to separate from the Christian label? You sense no desire from others to walk away from your type of “Christianity” due the destructive force it has morphed into?

      • But I do not hate my race. This is where your unique philosophy falls apart.

      • thordaddy


        Nothing has “broken” down… You have only updated your belief. So you do not “hate” your race, rather, you are not at all concerned as to whether your race survives and in the meantime you have plenty of “love” for other races and one could presume this “love” translates into a desire for their continuation? So your liberalism isn’t quite as noxious as your more radical “brothers.”

      • I know that in your world love of people with white pigmentation in their skin is mutually exclusive with Christ’s teaching to love one’s neighbor regardless of skin color. There is no need to keep repeating yourself on this issue.

      • thordaddy


        You are the one that is CONTINUOUSLY taking all discussions about white Supremacy to only discussion about how I feel about “blacks.” And I have continuously told you that white Supremacy IN THE ABSOLUTE SENSE is not RELATED to the “black” collective. To which you can only revert back to trying to tie my discussion on white Supremacy to the “black” collective. And again and again.

        The white Christian believes in objective Supremacy, ie. Perfection…

        The white Supremacist believes in objective Supremacy, ie. Perfection…

        Ergo, white Christian equals white Supremacist.

        Now, the zeitgeist desires anti-white Supremacists…


        The zeitgeist IS anti-white Christian…

        The zeitgeist is anti-white Supremacy…

        What does the “black” colllective have to do with any of this? When and where they shall ever desire objective Supremacy, ie., Perfection, I shall desire to see it first hand. Please God, show me anywhere a “black” individual desires objective Supremacy?

      • So it is your position that your self proclaimed hatred of “niggers” has no connection with your concept of white Supremacy?

      • thordaddy


        Of course there is “connection…”


        NOT in the direction you imagine.

        Existence of niggers –> wS…

        And NOT…

        “White supremacy” –> hatred of nigger.

        Can you comprehend THIS ORDER?

      • You are truly a lost soul. I feel sorry for you. But I do wish you well.

      • thordaddy


        No man… You are the brainwashed one… The one who believes that you are forbidden from striving towards Supremacy because you are a white man and black people exist… It’s crazy, man.

      • Why does my striving for perfection have to be in relation to anyone else?

      • thordaddy


        Do you deny the existence of niggers?

        You certainly do not deny the existence of white “racists,” ie., “white supremacists.”

        What gives BUT A THOROUGH BRAINWASHING or a desire for self-annihilation?

      • thordaddy


        Nothing… That’s the whole point… Being a genuine white Supremacist HAS NOTHING TO DO with the “black” collective.

      • Answer me this… is it better to be a lone white Supremacist separated from his children (and I assume his wife) or to have a wife and two children who live together and love each other?

      • thordaddy


        It’s always preferable that a healthy-minded father be with his wife and children.

      • thordaddy


        I think it self-evident that “we” exist in a society that DOES NOT PREFER its children to be in the hands of a healthy-minded father… “We” exist in a society that desires the total liberation of its children. This would include a “father’s” brainwashing of his children to a belief in “universal equality.”

      • So you live alone separated from your children. Do you think this is the best way to foster the survival of your “white race”?

      • thordaddy


        If the question is a choice between being a self-annihilating “Christian” in order to live with one’s children versus taking the risk of separation because one desires white Supremacy then in my case, I’ve chosen the latter as it is far more important to the ultimate future of my children.

  6. thordaddy

    Luke 14:26 SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED as a command, but a “condition…” A self-annihilating condition… One in which he who seeks discipleship is sick with self-loathing and hatred of his father… Such individual is ripe for conversion to a love of Father… And then upon such conversion said individual is truly prepared for discipleship.

  7. thordaddy

    Despite his claims that his racism is a love of father and not hatred of “other” he has specifically stated he is against racial mixing and integration.. — wS

    No, not “specifically…” I am against FORCED INTEGRATION especially with genuine white Supremacy as the only viable alternative AND I am against the BIG LIE in the “good” of miscegenation which would presume an assimilation of black pathology into white Supremacy and vice versa, but which does nothing of the sort.

  8. thordaddy

    My “racism” is not “traditional.” My “racism” is just “matter of fact” and devoid of a liberal ideological infection. My “racism” is an immersion in things racial where your “racism” only exists in relation to “blacks” and as an illusion to be deconstructed into a meaningless nothing. The practical result being your own annihilation “courtesy” of a total denial in an unconscious expression of true radical autonomy.

  9. thordaddy

    “His logic in claiming Christianity endorses racism seems to be rooted in the primacy of racism in his own mind. In other words, he believes racism is true and correct and that Christianity is also true and correct. As such Christianity ipso facto must endorse racism and anyone who does not endorse racism is ipso facto not a real Christian. — wS

    You need to recognize that this “primacy” is all in YOUR MIND… YOU NEED TO KEEP THE FOCUS on “white” so that the substantive argument stays off OBJECTIVE SUPREMACY and WHO ACTUALLY has the penchant to obtain it? You operate under the DELUSION that men pursue Perfection equally… Or, if you are at least wise enough to reject such an obvious anti-reality then you will still insist that all races pursue Perfection equally. And it is in this equally absurd claim that you are unwilling to concede that some races pursue Perfection more fervently and faithfully than others SO MUCH SO that you employ a myriad of tactics to avoid an empirical finality to this very question.

    What I will say is I desire to strive towards Supremacy and this is not at all motivated by the “black” collective ALTHOUGH the “black” collective observed “it” in me FIRST…. And then worked to impose this “white supremacy” upon me. It was, in their very ruthless way, the attempt to relativize what would become absolutely what they fear most… A white man that seeks a total separation… A falsification of the “slave” psychosis of the radical “black” collective.

  10. thordaddy

    A neighbor is one who is not alien to you… Not deleterious to one’s existence. If a “neighbor’s” house is on fire and you gather up ten men and the local fire truck and upon commencing a deluge of the house fire your crew is shot at, killing two, then said “neighbor” ceases to be so…

    So there is a here from there… Your ACTUAL NEIGHBOR IS NOT ALIEN TO YOU NOR deleterious to your existence or the existence of your children and so your money is not even where your mouth is…

    To truly test yourself, you must PUT YOURSELF AND YOUR WIFE AND CHILDREN amonsgt the truly degenerate and then rationalize it all by imagining a “universal equality.”

  11. thordaddy

    Teach all nations WHAT?

    The Perfect Man as empirical fact FALSIFIES “universal equality,” ie., The Liberal ideology of Self-annihilation.

  12. thordaddy

    I stated that the Bible says nothing about “racism” or “racists” and so this “gospel of racism”‘ is another manufactured strawman of yours used for diversion… What I did try to get you to clarify is whether you believe that a mandate to hate one’s father is a mandate to hate one’s self and that Christ actually teaches his worshipppers to hate themselves? You have yet to make available your unequivocal answer to this question?

    I am a white Supremacist BECAUSE I am a white man who believes in and therefore strives towards objective Supremacy. Period.


    “Why is ‘white’ so important, primary, essential and necessary” as though you suffered of Tourette’s syndrome.

    You CAN DIFFERENTIATE between an absolute statement and an IDEOLOGICAL BRAINWASHING, can you not?

  13. Pingback: Advice to the Next Blogger Stalked by Thordaddy | Winston Scrooge

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s